合作客戶/
拜耳公司 |
同濟(jì)大學(xué) |
聯(lián)合大學(xué) |
美國(guó)保潔 |
美國(guó)強(qiáng)生 |
瑞士羅氏 |
相關(guān)新聞Info
-
> 表面張力輔助制造陶瓷厚膜，突破傳統(tǒng)陶瓷膜制備方法的局限
> 基于微量天平測(cè)定人血白蛋白辛酸鈉含量
> 表面張力能怎么玩？下面就是一些常見的小實(shí)驗(yàn)方案~
> 表面張力儀應(yīng)用：研究活性磁化水對(duì)無煙煤塵的濕潤(rùn)作用（二）
> 生活中的表面張力：鋼針?biāo)掀⒔饫焙捅砻鎻埩τ惺裁搓P(guān)系？
> 啤酒表面張力與泡沫持久性關(guān)系的研究
> 中科院江雷及團(tuán)隊(duì)提出鋪展概念及其表征方法
> 鹽水溶液中，磺酸型含氟表面活性劑復(fù)合體系表、界面張力和潤(rùn)濕性研究（三）
> 水的表面為什么會(huì)有張力？表面張力的形成與影響因素
> 納米沸石咪唑酯骨架ZIF-8顆粒的油水界面張力和接觸角測(cè)定及巖心驅(qū)替實(shí)驗(yàn)——結(jié)果與討論、結(jié)論
推薦新聞Info
-
> ?警惕表面張力誤差！實(shí)驗(yàn)室濕度控制對(duì)超微量天平的3大影響
> 警惕！表面活性劑過期：被忽視的百萬元研發(fā)損失風(fēng)險(xiǎn)
> 馬來酸酐為聯(lián)接劑，合成Gemini非離子表面活性劑的表面性能測(cè)試
> Langmuir槽法研究不同電性Gemini表面活性劑對(duì)界面吸附膜性質(zhì)的影響（三）
> Langmuir槽法研究不同電性Gemini表面活性劑對(duì)界面吸附膜性質(zhì)的影響（二）
> Langmuir槽法研究不同電性Gemini表面活性劑對(duì)界面吸附膜性質(zhì)的影響（一）
> 生物表面活性劑產(chǎn)生菌的篩選及對(duì)PAHs污染環(huán)境的修復(fù)效果研究（四）
> 生物表面活性劑產(chǎn)生菌的篩選及對(duì)PAHs污染環(huán)境的修復(fù)效果研究（三）
> 生物表面活性劑產(chǎn)生菌的篩選及對(duì)PAHs污染環(huán)境的修復(fù)效果研究（二）
> 生物表面活性劑產(chǎn)生菌的篩選及對(duì)PAHs污染環(huán)境的修復(fù)效果研究（一）
表面活性劑是否對(duì)斥水性土壤的潤(rùn)濕性有影響？——結(jié)論、致謝！
來源：上海謂載 瀏覽 1579 次 發(fā)布時(shí)間:2021-11-09
結(jié)論
不像人工創(chuàng)造的穩(wěn)定的驅(qū)蟲表面或多孔 介質(zhì)，拒水土壤表現(xiàn)出潤(rùn)濕動(dòng)力學(xué)，由此 最初疏水的土壤隨著時(shí)間的推移變得親水 與水接觸時(shí)。 初始潤(rùn)濕動(dòng)力學(xué) 排斥土壤通常歸因于 固液界面能 (γSL)，或液汽界面能 (γLV) 的降低，或兩者兼而有之。 γLV 的減少 建議是由于土壤表面溶解 活性有機(jī)化合物進(jìn)入與水接觸的水中 土壤。 在這項(xiàng)研究中，我們測(cè)試了土傳表面的影響 潤(rùn)濕動(dòng)力學(xué)的活性物質(zhì)，并發(fā)現(xiàn)，與廣為接受的范式相反，土壤釋放表面 活性化合物不會(huì)加速潤(rùn)濕過程。 因此很明顯，固體界面能的變化 表面（γSL 或 γSV），而不是液汽 表面 (γLV) 必須在驅(qū)動(dòng)不穩(wěn)定排斥性土壤的潤(rùn)濕動(dòng)力學(xué)方面起主導(dǎo)作用。
致謝
本研究由以色列農(nóng)業(yè)部資助 和農(nóng)村發(fā)展，資助號(hào) 821-0088-04。
參考
Barrett, G. & Slaymaker, O. 1989. Identification, characterization, and hydrological implications of water repellency in mountain soils, southern British-Columbia. Catena, 16, 477–489.
Bisdom, E.B.A., Dekker, L.W. & Schoute, J.F.T. 1993. Water repellency of sieve fractions from sandy soils and relationships with organic material and soil structure. Geoderma, 56, 105–118.
Chen, Y. & Schnitzer, M. 1978. Surface-tension of aqueous-solutions of soil humic substances. Soil Science, 125, 7–15.
Dekker, L.W., Oostindie, K. & Ritsema, C.J. 2005. Exponential increase of publications related to soil water repellency. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 43, 403–441.
Dinar, E., Taraniuk, I., Graber, E.R., Katsman, S., Moise, T., Anttila, T. et al. 2006. Cloud condensation nuclei properties of model and atmospheric HULIS. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 6, 2465–2481.
Doerr, S.H., Shakesby, R.A. & Walsh, R.P.D. 2000. Soil water repellency: its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance. Earth-Science Reviews, 51, 33–65.
Doerr, S.H., Dekker, L.W., Ritsema, C.J., Shakesby, R.A. & Bryant, R. 2002. Water repellency of soils: the influence of ambient relative humidity. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66, 401–405.
Ellerbrock, R.H., Gerke, H.H., Bachmann, J. & Goebel, M.O. 2005. Composition of organic matter fractions for explaining wettability of three forest soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 69, 57–66.
Feng, G.L., Letey, J. & Wu, L. 2002. The influence of two surfactants on infiltration into a water-repellent soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66, 361–367.
Gee, G.W. & Bauder, J.W. 1986. Particle-size analysis. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Monograph No 9 (ed. A. Klute), pp. 383–411.
American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI. Graber, E.R., Ben-Arie, O. & Wallach, R. 2006. Effect of sample disturbance on soil water repellency determination in sandy soils. Geoderma, 136, 11–19.
Hurrass, J. & Schaumann, G.E. 2006. Properties of soil organic matter and aqueous extracts of actually water repellent and wettable soil samples. Geoderma, 132, 222–239.
Letey, J. 1969. Measurement of contact angle, water drop penetration time, and critical surface tension. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Water Repellent Soils 6–8 May 1968 (eds L.F. DeBano & J.F. Letey), pp. 43–47. University of California, Riverside, CA. Letey, J., Carrillo, M.L.K. & Pang, X.P. 2000. Approaches to characterize the degree of water repellency. Journal of Hydrology, 231–232, 61–65.
Ma'shum, M. & Farmer, V.C. 1985. Origin and assessment of water repellency of a sandy South Australian soil. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 23, 623–626.
Roy, J.L. & McGill, W.B. 2002. Assessing soil water repellency using the molarity of ethanol droplet (MED) test. Soil Science, 167, 83–97.
Tschapek, M. 1984. Criteria for determining the hydrophilicityhydrophobicity of soils. Zeitschrift fu¨r Pflanzenerna¨hrung und Bodenkunde, 147, 137–149.
Walkley, A. & Black, I.A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modifi- cation of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37, 29–38. Wallach, R. & Graber, E.R. 2007. Effluent irrigation-induced soil water repellency: time dependent variation of infiltration rate and of water repellency at different levels of ambient relative humidity. Hydrological Processes, 21, 2346–2355.
Wallach, R., Ben-Arie, O. & Graber, E.R. 2005. Soil water repellency induced by long-term irrigation with treated sewage effluent. Journal of Environmental Quality, 34, 1910–1920.
Wallis, M.G. & Horne, D.J. 1992. Soil water repellency. Advances in Soil Science, 20, 91–140.
表面活性劑是否對(duì)斥水性土壤的潤(rùn)濕性有影響？——概括、介紹
表面活性劑是否對(duì)斥水性土壤的潤(rùn)濕性有影響？——材料和方法